Bright-line rule

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Look up bright-line rule in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

A bright-line rule, or bright-line test, is a term generally used in law which describes a clearly defined rule or standard, composed of objective factors, which leaves little or no room for varying interpretation. The purpose of a bright-line rule is to produce predictable and consistent results in its application.

Bright-line rules are usually standards established by courts in legal precedent or by legislatures in statutory provisions. Bright-line rules are often contrasted with "squishy" balancing tests, where a result is dependent on weighing several factors, which could lead to inconsistent application of law or reduce objectivity.

Contents 1 Debate in the US 2 Examples of bright-line rules 3 Notable cases containing bright-line rules 4 References 5 External links

[edit] Debate in the US

In the United States, there is much scholarly legal debate between those favoring bright-line rules and those favoring balancing tests. While some legal scholars, such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, have expressed a strong preference for bright-line rules, critics often argue that bright-line rules are over-simplistic and can lead to harsh and unjust results. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer noted that there are circumstances in which the application of bright-line rules would be inappropriate, stating that "no single set of legal rules can ever capture the ever changing complexity of human life."^[1] Over the course of the last three decades, many bright-line rules previously established in U.S. jurisprudence have been replaced with balancing tests.^{[citation needed]}

[edit] Examples of bright-line rules

• American Statutory rape laws, including Romeo and Juliet laws - In most states, the age of the victim and the age of the accused are the only relevant factors determinative of guilt or innocence.^[2] Because it is a bright-line rule, there is no balancing test to examine factors such as mistake of the accused, the misrepresentation of age by the minor, or the minor's consent to sexual intercourse.

[edit] Notable cases containing bright-line rules

• Miranda v. Arizona
• Goldberg v. Kelly
• Storer Doctrine
• Bridgeport Music Inc. v. Dimension Films
• SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194 (1947)
• National Petroleum Refiners Assn. v. FTC, 482 F.2d 672 (D.C. Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 951 (1974)
• Heckler v. Campbell, 461 U.S. 458 (1983)
• Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital, 488 U.S. 204 (1988)
• Sameena, Inc. v. U.S. Air Force, 147 F.3d 1148 9th Cir. (1998)
• Evans v the UK

[edit] References

1. ^ Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 125, 126 S. Ct. 1515, 1529, 164 L. Ed. 2d 208, 229 (2006) (Breyer, J., concurring).
2. ^ Statutory Rape Laws by State

[edit] External links

• Language Log Discussion of the phrase, with examples and history