Talk:Geophysics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| WikiProject Physics | (Rated Start-Class, Top-importance) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
| WikiProject Geology | (Rated Start-Class, Top-importance) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
| Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page. (January 2007) |
[edit] Reviewing Cheatsheet
- The following highlights current issues. Feel free to either add the issues you've identified, or to strike them as they've been resolved.
WikiProject Physics' Reviewing Cheatsheet (11:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC))
Do not remove the elements, but rather strike them as they becomes useless or irrelevant (i.e write <s>text to be struck</s>) to indicate that this element was verified and found to be alright.
If everything in one of the section (i.e everything in one hidden-box has been addressed), strike that particular hidden box's title.
This cheetsheet can be used by anyone.
To add the Reviewing Cheatsheet to an article's talk page, simply place {{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Projects of the Week/Reviewing Cheatsheet}} immediately before the first section.
- Add/Expand :
-
- The following sections needs to be expanded/created :
-
- Lead
- Overview
- References
- Lists
- See also
- Infoboxes and Navboxes :
-
- The following navboxes and infoboxes could be useful :
-
- WikiProject Physics templates (browse)
- Physics navboxes (browse)
- {{Nobel Prize in Physics}}
- {{Infobox Scientist}}
- {{Infobox Particle}}
- Categorize
-
- Make sure the article is properly categorized :
-
- Browse Category:Physics, to find other categories
- Do not overcategorize
- Categorize alphabetically
- Cleanup
-
- Article MoS Compliance :
-
- Acronyms and abbreviations are spelled out on first use
- Appropriate use of reference templates
- En dashes, em dashes, hyphens, and minus signs are properly used
- External Links
- Images/Diagrams
-
- Captionned
- Correctly aligned
- Copyediting :
-
- The following sections needs to be copyedited (give reason) :
- Disambiguation :
-
- The following elements needs to be disambiguated :
- Considering referring these section to a main article :
- The following elements may be too technical for the casual reader, consider defining and explaining them to non-experts:
- Merge/Split :
-
- Consider merging or splitting these sections with another article, or merging another article's section with this one (give reason):
- Problems :
-
- The following problems have been identified :
- Requests :
-
- Consider making a request to these people (give reason):
-
- Talk Page :
-
- Archive old and irrelevant discussions
- Consider structuring discussion according to "topics"
- Sort boxes in this order (consider adding them if they aren't there):
-
- {{skiptotoctalk}}
- {{talkheader}}
- {{ArticleHistory}}
- Wikiprojects (browse to find other relevant projects)
-
- If there are more than one WikiProject, use {{WikiProjectBanners}} and order them alphabetically within the banner.
- WP 0.5/1.0 Editorial Team,
- WP Echo
- Other boxes
- To do box
- Archive box
- Update importance and rating
- Update :
-
- These sections or statements are out of date :
- Verify :
-
- The following needs to be verified :
-
- Factual accuracy
- References
- Name of the article
- Up-to-date-ness
- Wikilink :
-
- The following elements needs to be wikilinked :
-
- People
- Experiments
- First use of units
- Dates (but not stand alone years)
- Miscellaneous remarks :
[edit] Suggestions
Some suggestions: - Include Teluric (MT, AMT,...) as an EM method into pure geophysics of the solid earth. - I think mineral physics should read minerals/rock physics and is also part of "pure" geophysics
In general I think we should say good-bye to the split between pure(theoretical) and applied geophysics. Some of the applied methods use more theoretical background than the classic/pure geophysicist can handle...
I also think oceanography and meteorology should be mentioned but have their own "main page".
---
In my opinion meteorology and oceanography are treated as independent subjects, closely related to, but not part of geophysics. Knowledge and research have become so immense, that they warrant a discipline of their own.
Yes and no. The theoretical side of atmospheric science is treated as a classic example of geophysical fluid dynamics- i.e. the application of the physics of fluids to the Earth system. In that sense, the theoretical side of meteorology is very much a branch of geophysics. However, meteorology and oceanograpy are also independent subjects and should (and do) have their own entries.
---
I suggest the following scheme:
Geophysics, the study of the earth by quantitative physical methods.
- Geophysics of the Atmosphere (Meteorology, climatology, upper air physics)
o Atmospheric electricity and terrestrial magnetism (including ionosphere
and Van Allen belt)
o Meteorology and Climatology, which both involve studies of the weather.
o Aeronomy, the study of the physical structure and chemistry of the
atmosphere.
- Geophysics of the oceans
o Physical Oceanography
- Geophysics of the solid Earth
+ Pure Geophysics
o Seismology (earthquakes and elastic waves)
o Gravity and geodesy (the earth's gravitational field and the size and
form of the earth)
o Geomagnetism (diurnal variations, dynamo theories)
o Geothermometry (heating of the earth, heat flow, volcanology,
and hot springs)
o Hydrology and glaciology (ground water, surface water and ice)
o Tectonophysics (dynamic processes in the earth)
+ Applied geophysics (exploration and engineering geophysics)
o Seismics
o electrical and electromagnetic methods
o gravity exploration
o magnetic exploration
o radioactivity
o Geophysical Engineering
o geomatics (applied geodesy)
o mineral physics
(Hans Erren 12:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC))

