Talk:Port-Royal Logic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details.

BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WPBooksBook articles WikiProject Books   Books portal v • d • e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.  ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:PhilosophyPhilosophy articles WikiProject Philosophy (Rated Stub-Class, Mid-importance) Philosophy portal v • d • e This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.  Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.  Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Further information and related task forces:   Logic Philosophical literature Modern philosophy

Is this the same as the "Port Royal Grammar" mentioned in linguistic works? AnonMoos (talk) 08:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

No, both are by Antoine Arnauld, but the grammar was co-written with fr:Claude Lancelot and the logic with Pierre Nicole. Srnec (talk) 05:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)