Welcome to roadstat.com on July 5 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Finance
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 1
Good article GA 1 3 4
B 13 16 15 6 25 75
C 3 5 2 10 12 32
Start 1 17 27 24 94 163
Stub 5 12 14 129 91 251
List 8 8
Assessed 22 50 59 169 234 534
Unassessed 2 3 325 330
Total 22 52 59 172 559 864

Welcome to the assessment department of the Finance WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Finance related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Finance}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Finance articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

[edit] Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Finance WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

[edit] Instructions

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Finance}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Finance| ... | class=??? | ... }}
Featured article FA 
A-Class article A 
Good article GA 
B-Class article B 
C-Class article C 
Start-Class article Start 
Stub-Class article Stub 
Unrated ??? 

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article:

Featured list FL 
List-Class article List 
Disambiguation page Disambig 
Template page Template 
Category page Category 
Non-article page NA 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Finance articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Finance articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

[edit] Quality scale

[edit] Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


Tulipmania is FA but given questionable as importance for this project, but mid importance in the Economics project. Bubbles are a fairly important topic now in econ, but especially in finance. I helped get this to FA so I wont change it myself.≈≈≈≈

[edit] Assessment log

Finance articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

[edit] July 2, 2009

[edit] June 26, 2009

[edit] June 21, 2009

[edit] June 17, 2009

[edit] June 11, 2009

[edit] June 6, 2009

[edit] June 3, 2009

[edit] May 19, 2009

[edit] May 16, 2009

[edit] May 11, 2009

[edit] May 6, 2009

[edit] May 2, 2009

[edit] April 24, 2009

[edit] April 20, 2009

[edit] April 17, 2009

[edit] April 13, 2009

[edit] April 9, 2009

[edit] April 6, 2009

[edit] March 31, 2009

[edit] March 28, 2009

[edit] March 24, 2009

[edit] March 20, 2009

[edit] March 8, 2009

[edit] March 4, 2009

[edit] February 16, 2009

[edit] February 12, 2009

[edit] January 31, 2009

[edit] January 27, 2009

[edit] January 15, 2009

[edit] January 10, 2009

[edit] January 7, 2009

[edit] January 3, 2009

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs